The Nobel Peace Prize, established by the Swedish inventor Alfred Nobel, stands as a global symbol for the pursuit of a better world. In his will, Nobel stipulated that the award should be given to the person who has done the most or the best work "for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses." This is the true and noble origin of the prize.
🧭 Drifting Off Course: The Shadow of Politicization
Despite the sublime origin of the award, it has been surrounded by much controversy and many questions that have challenged its credibility. The core problem lies in the "politicization" of the prize—its use as a tool to support specific political or ideological agendas, rather than focusing on universal standards of global and humanitarian peace.
1. Shifting Standards and Clear Loyalties
It is often observed that the prize is awarded to individuals or organizations that oppose certain regimes or policies, particularly those that do not align with the prevailing Western or liberal lobby's orientation. This tendency sends a message that the prize may be given not to those who have achieved peace on the ground, but to those who have opposed a regime "according to preference."
Rewarding Dissent: Focus on political activism and radical opposition sometimes overshadows comprehensive and neutral efforts in building genuine peace and reconciliation between peoples.
Ignoring Silent Peacebuilders: Figures and initiatives that quietly and steadily work to establish peace and development in conflict zones, often avoiding the sharp political spotlight, are frequently overlooked.
2. Erosion of Trust and Credibility
When the prize is granted to figures or leaders who are still in the midst of conflicts or making decisions about war, it leads to an erosion of trust in the Nobel Committee itself. This contradiction prompts many around the world to view the prize with suspicion, perceiving it as a political instrument for pressure or support, rather than an impartial tribute to humanity.
📢 A Call to Global Conscience and Prize Valour
To restore the Nobel Peace Prize to its rightful status, the awarding committee and the entire international community must return to the path of righteousness and honour the prize to those who truly deserve it.
1. Adherence to the Original Will
The sole criterion must be Alfred Nobel’s original will: honouring those who have worked to establish brotherhood, peace, and the abolition of war. Radical inclinations and geographical or political loyalties must be neutralized, adopting a universal approach that encompasses all cultures and orientations.
2. Supporting True Peace Architects
The Nobel Committee is called upon to seek out the true architects of peace whose efforts are embodied in:
Comprehensive Reconciliation Efforts: Honoring those working to mend the rift between warring communities on the ground.
Sustainable Development Initiatives: Granting the prize to those who use economic development and education to pull out the roots of conflict and violence.
Quiet and Effective Diplomacy: Recognizing diplomats and negotiators who achieve tangible results in ending wars and securing ceasefires.
3. Absolute Neutrality and Objectivity
Absolute objectivity and neutrality must become the fundamental motto of the Committee’s work. When the prize is awarded far from political blemishes and biases, it will regain its lustre and truly become the voice of global conscience that rewards pure humanitarian contribution, capable of educating the world about the importance of genuine peace that transcends narrow political conflicts and borders.